This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Business & Tech

Are Short Sales Driving Prices Down?

Short sales: Recipe for success or disaster?

I receive Real Estate magazine in my mailbox each month. This is a magazine that is part of my real estate association membership, and always has some pertinent articles in it.

The articles this week were all about short sales. It’s hard to turn without hearing the term “short sale” these days.

The cover story, “Short sale, Tall Order?” refers to the fact that it’s a challenging transaction (this is an understatement). But the message is that the short sales can be “a major component of economic recovery.”

Interested in local real estate?Subscribe to Patch's new newsletter to be the first to know about open houses, new listings and more.

I seem to be alone in my opinion, but I think short sales are causing more harm than good. A short sale is a tough sale — hard for buyers, hard for agents, a long agonizing process — so the only way to entice a buyer to take part in such an uncertain purchase is to offer an amazing price.

If your neighbor suddenly decides to sell their home as a short sale, by definition they will sell it under market value — but after it closes, it will define the new market value. In effect, lowering the value of your home, next door.

Interested in local real estate?Subscribe to Patch's new newsletter to be the first to know about open houses, new listings and more.

It’s the domino effect, and the reason that I think short sales are hurting the market. Are there better options?

If the house goes through the foreclosure process, it could become bank-owned — or it could become investor-owned. If an investor buys your neighbor’s house at the foreclosure auction, then you got lucky: They will fix it up, stage it, and sell it for top dollar.

On the other hand, if the bank takes it back, they will typically do nothing, the photos will be uncomplimentary, and the home will sell for a rock-bottom price (but still more than a short sale in most cases).

It’s no secret that a home that shows well will sell for more money — so why are the banks reluctant to spend a bit on paint and carpet and professional photography in order to see a return that will more than justify the expense?

Maybe the banks are starting to see the light, because they are doing a few cosmetic upgrades occasionally. But here’s a recent example that is more in keeping with their profile: a beautiful 6,000 square foot estate came on the market as a bank-owned property. The agent comments for showings included the following advice: “Broken glass in master bathroom, please use caution.”

Wouldn’t you think taking a broom and dustpan to the glass would be almost less trouble than typing that sentence? And certainly more in keeping with “show condition.”

Short sales are often worse, as far as show condition goes. This is not a seller motivated to achieve top dollar; this is an understandably depressed seller. I showed one short sale home to buyers in Walnut Creek where we were literally stepping over dirty underwear left on the teen-age son’s floor. And that was par for the course in this house.

The rest of the world seems to think that short sales are the answer — but I think they are part of the problem. I would like to see the homes on the market shown to their full potential. Let’s get top dollar on every sale. That would be my idea of a road to recovery.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?