patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

School Funding Cuts 'Bleak' If Governor's Tax Initiative Fails, District Says

The San Ramon Valley Unified District will be in a hole no matter what but, if Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative doesn't pass, district officials said cuts could between $14-$15 million.

 

The San Ramon Valley Unified District won't get as much funding this year as they did last year from the state. There's no question about that. However, where the uncertainty lies is exactly how much less it will be.

On Tuesday night, Gary Black, SRVUSD's assistant superintendent of business, presented two scenarios on what state funding would look like if Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative passed or failed.

Brown's initiative, in short, would raise the sales tax, as well as increase the income tax on those who make $250,000 or more. If this initiative passes, it would prevent a statewide "trigger" cut of $5 billion in public education, Brown has said.

A bleak affair

For the SRVUSD, Black said this reduction would equate to about a $14 million to $15 million hole.

"It's pretty bleak," he told the school board. "More bleak than what it sounds like. It's a significant amount of money."

The loss in funding would include a $370 average daily attendance (ADA) funding per student (about $10.8 million total), $600,000 to $1.4 million in transportation funding and about $3 million in teacher salary and benefits costs.

The best case?

If Brown's plan goes through in November, according to Black's presentation, the "challenge" to the district would be less. It would then have to fill a hole to the tune of $3.6 million to $4.4 million.

This was, actually, the "best case" scenario. Under this, there would be "flat funding," or the same funding level as the current year from the state. The cuts under the "best case" would come from the removal of transportation funding (about $600,000 to $1.4 million), as well as costs due to teachers' pay and benefits ($3 million).

A continuation of cuts

These reductions come on the heels of continued cuts from the state. Late last year, in November, state officials announced that California will be receiving $3.7 billion less in revenues this fiscal year than they expected.

That resulted in an automatic mid-year cut of $2 billion to education and social services.

Terry Koehne, a spokesman for the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, told Danville Patch in November that the district expects to receive $7.8 million less in state funds the remainder of this fiscal year.

Rather than cut from the district's $223 million budget, district administrators plan to use $7.8 million of the $18 million available reserve funds to plug the gap.

In November, Koehne noted that, over the past four years, the district had already been receiving $30 million less a year in state funds than it's entitled to receive under Proposition 98.

Black also noted in his presentation that under Brown's proposed budget, there is the point of replacing the current revenue limit funding model with a new "weight average." Black, however, couldn't comment on what that means or how that would shake out.

"Right now there is no way to know. There is not enough info but it could be significant," he said.

Taking a dip in the reserve

So as these challenges continue to trickle down from the state, whether Brown's initiative passes or not, the district will have to further dip into the reserve.

"Twenty million dollars (in reserve), whether it's good planning, or being conservative, whatever you want to call it, we will survive but not for long," Black said if these cuts continue.

"Imagine what it'd be like if we did not have these reserve dollars," said Board of Education president Greg Marvel. "You have a lot of other district that will have these same issues next year and they don't have the reserves we have."

Stick with Danville and San Ramon Patch as we follow this story.

Follow Danville Patch on Facebook or Twitter and sign up for our newsletter to stay connected to Danville news.

Related Topics: Jerry Brown, San Ramon Valley Unifired School District, School Cuts, and Taxes

Sam Clemens

7:17 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

Most people in the private sector are earning less than they did several years ago.

Why did the district pay teachers for two furlough days just a few months ago?   That was like giving them two extra paid vacation days,  

How much more in solar panel debt service is the district paying than it would have cost to buy the panel generated energy (kwh) from PG&E?

Why is the district preoccupied with a $250 million facilities investment, but has no plans to force change in union work rules, hiring, compensation and termination practices?  We force our children to submit to second rate schools (globally), but require no action on the issues that really matter.

Suggest the SRVSD 1) reduce compensation, benefits overall by implementing pay for performance structure including termination of high seniority low performing staff, and increasing pay of high performers. 2) Increase the use of technology in the class room to cut  labor hours and increase program quality.  In short, restructure to cut costs and improve quality.

Stop crying about reduced funding, and get busy using the resources you have more effectively.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Terry Parris Jr.

9:31 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

Sam: Interesting points. Can you supply examples or model districts that have followed similar plans?

Sam Clemens

10:19 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

Terry

The Wash DC district did something along the lines of charter. Unfortunately the union ran the superintendent out of town.

These are "outside the box" recommendations. Unions never change until their "host" dies or weakens.

Thus the only real way to force change is to starve the dysfunctional system, while funding an improved one.

Bankruptcy, diminished "customer base" and cash flow best created by competitive alternatives is the likely effective driver of change.

Thus invest in the charter/voucher. Definitely don't feed the dysfunctional system with $250 million in facilities.

Same logic applies to state and local govt by the way.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Terry Parris Jr.

10:28 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

What would this district look like -- 35 charter schools for 30,000 students? At some point, won't these buildings also need to be upgraded and modernized? Are you saying by having these types of schools where teacher unions don't exist (where it's more a private entity), it will be a more functioning system?

Sam Clemens

10:42 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

Perhaps spin off faculties from SRVSD, or invest greenfield. I think charters can be publically funded withe the proposed bond money. Start with a minimum effective sized K-12 system, and then take over vacant SRVSD facilities as kids flee to the charters.

I only know that the management and board focuses on spending money and not the harder changes involving people.

The board is asking "what new facilities do we need"?

They should be asking how do we change to create world class schools. Think Singapore, Shanghai, Norway etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Terry Parris Jr.

10:46 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

"Think Singapore, Shanghai, Norway etc." -- What do those models look like?

Beau Hunk

10:50 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

The governor and the legislature are killing education in California. And yet the teacher's union still supports liberal democrats.

"When you always do what you've always done..."

Reply

Sam Clemens

10:53 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

Google them. U will see their excellent test results, hiring teaching practices and compensation standards.

What to do is pretty clear. Changing the people who occupy our public schools to the student's detriment requires "creative destruction" (Joseph Schumpter)

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Terry Parris Jr.

11:14 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012

Sam: Absolutely will Google. I thought maybe you could comment on it. But I'll check it out myself for sure.

Reply

Ann

8:26 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012

When people start talking about budget cuts, why don't they question the salaries of the Superintendent and Asst. Superintendent of business that are being paid $237,000 and $180,000 respectively a year? There are CEOs of larger companies that are making a lot less than this. Is running the school district with less employees more complicated than running a company?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Raleigh

12:21 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012

Agreed! . The large salaries greatly increase the amount of discretionary income and the ability for a person to save for their retirement like the private sector. Why not consider a base pension rate that is not tied to salaries...

Sam Clemens

9:44 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012

The CEO's have to face up to unpleasant issues. School management just needs to snow the school board and take direction from the union

Reply

Leave a comment